Polberg, Sylwia ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0811-0226, Hunter, Anthony and Thimm, Matthias 2017. Belief in attacks in epistemic probabilistic argumentation. Presented at: SUM 2017, Granada, Spain, 4-6 Oct 2017. Published in: Moral, Serafín, Pivert, Olivier, Sánchez, Daniel and Marín, Nicolás eds. Scalable Uncertainty Management. Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Lecture Notes in Computer Science , vol.10564 Cham, Switzerland: Springer Verlag, pp. 223-236. 10.1007/978-3-319-67582-4_16 |
Preview |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (340kB) | Preview |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-67582-4_16
Abstract
The epistemic approach to probabilistic argumentation as- signs belief to arguments. This is valuable in dialogical argumentation where one agent can model the beliefs another agent has in the argu ments and this can be harnessed to make strategic choices of arguments to present. In this paper, we extend this epistemic approach by also rep- resenting the belief in attacks. We investigate properties of this proposal and compare it to the constellations approach showing neither subsumes the other.
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (Paper) |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Computer Science & Informatics |
Publisher: | Springer Verlag |
ISBN: | 978-3-319-67581-7 |
ISSN: | 0302-9743 |
Funders: | EPSRC |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 12 March 2019 |
Date of Acceptance: | 8 June 2017 |
Last Modified: | 03 Dec 2024 07:15 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/120621 |
Citation Data
Cited 14 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
Edit Item |