Revisiting support in abstract argumentation systems

Polberg, Sylwia ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0811-0226 and Oren, Nir 2014. Revisiting support in abstract argumentation systems. Presented at: 5th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, Pitlochry, Scotland, 9-12 September 2014. Published in: Parsons, S, Oren, N, Reed, C and Cerutti, F eds. Computational Models of Argument, Proceedings of COMMA 2014. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications , vol.216 IOS Press, 369 - 376. 10.3233/978-1-61499-436-7-369 Item availability restricted.

PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version Restricted to Repository staff only Download (145kB)

Abstract

Dung's original argumentation frameworks have been extended in various ways. One such extension introduces positive interactions, or support, between arguments. Frameworks containing evidential, necessary, and deductive supports have been proposed, and it is natural to compare these and analyse whether translations between these are possible. Although a positive answer was given in the necessary and deductive cases, it was claimed that evidential support cannot be expressed by any other type and that it cannot be handled together with them in a single framework. In this paper we show that it is not the case and that there exists a natural translation between argumentation frameworks with necessities and evidential argumentation systems.

Item Type:	Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Computer Science & Informatics
Publisher:	IOS Press
ISBN:	978-1-61499-435-0
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	1 April 2019
Date of Acceptance:	19 May 2014
Last Modified:	25 Oct 2022 13:58
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/121305

Citation Data

Cited 33 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item