Biparty decision theory for dialogical argumentation

Hadoux, Emmanuel, Hunter, Anthony and Polberg, Sylwia ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0811-0226 2018. Biparty decision theory for dialogical argumentation. Presented at: 7th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument, Warsaw, Poland, 12th-14 September 2018. Published in: Modgil, Sanjay and Budzynska, Katarzyna eds. Computational Models of Argument. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications , vol.305 IOS, pp. 233-240. 10.3233/978-1-61499-906-5-233

Preview

PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version Download (210kB) | Preview

Abstract

Proposals for strategies for dialogical argumentation often focus on situations where one of the agents wins the dialogue and the other agent loses. Yet in real-world argumentation, it is common for agents to not involve such zero-sum situations. Rather, the agents may enter into a dialogue with divergent but not necessarily opposing views on what is important in the outcomes from the argumentation. In order to model this kind of situation, we investigate a decision-theoretic approach that allows different participants to have different utility evaluations of a dialogue, and for the proponent to model the opponent's utility evaluation in order to optimize the choice of move in the dialogue.

Item Type:	Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Status:	Published
Schools:	Computer Science & Informatics
Publisher:	IOS
ISBN:	978-1-61499-905-8
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	1 April 2019
Date of Acceptance:	25 June 2018
Last Modified:	25 Oct 2022 13:58
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/121307

Citation Data

Cited 1 time in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item