Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Expert quotes and exaggeration in health news: a retrospective quantitative content analysis

Bossema, Francien G., Burger, Peter, Bratton, Luke, Challenger, Aimee, Adams, Rachel C. ORCID:, Sumner, Petroc ORCID:, Schat, Joop, Numans, Mattijs E. and Smeets, Ionica 2019. Expert quotes and exaggeration in health news: a retrospective quantitative content analysis. Wellcome Open Research 4 , 56. 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15147.2

[thumbnail of Sumner. Expert quotes.pub2.pdf]
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (800kB) | Preview


Background This research is an investigation into the role of expert quotes in health news, specifically whether news articles containing a quote from an independent expert are less often exaggerated than articles without such a quote. Methods Retrospective quantitative content analysis of journal articles, press releases, and associated news articles was performed. The investigated sample are press releases on peer-reviewed health research and the associated research articles and news stories. Our sample consisted of 462 press releases and 668 news articles from the UK (2011) and 129 press releases and 185 news articles from The Netherlands (2015). We hand-coded all journal articles, press releases and news articles for correlational claims, using a well-tested codebook. The main outcome measures are types of sources that were quoted and exaggeration of correlational claims. We used counts, 2x2 tables and odds ratios to assess the relationship between presence of quotes and exaggeration of the causal claim. Results Overall, 99.1% of the UK press releases and 84.5% of the Dutch press releases contain at least one quote. For the associated news articles these percentages are: 88.6% in the UK and 69.7% in the Netherlands. Authors of the study are most often quoted and only 7.5% of UK and 7.0% of Dutch news articles contained a new quote by an expert source, i.e. one not provided by the press release. The relative odds that an article without an external expert quote contains an exaggeration of causality is 2.6. Conclusions The number of articles containing a quote from an independent expert is low, but articles that cite an external expert do contain less exaggeration.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Cardiff University Brain Research Imaging Centre (CUBRIC)
Publisher: F1000Research
ISSN: 2398-502X
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 8 April 2019
Date of Acceptance: 27 March 2019
Last Modified: 06 Jan 2024 04:22

Citation Data

Cited 5 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics