Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Discussion points for Bayesian inference

Aczel, Balazs, Hoekstra, Rink, Gelman, Andrew, Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan, Klugkist, Irene G., Rouder, Jeffrey N., Vandekerckhove, Joachim, Lee, Michael D., Morey, Richard D. ORCID:, Vanpaemel, Wolf, Dienes, Zoltan and Ravenzwaaij, Don van 2020. Discussion points for Bayesian inference. Nature Human Behaviour 4 , pp. 561-563. 10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z

[thumbnail of Morey. Discussion points.pdf]
PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (142kB) | Preview


Why is there no consensual way of conducting Bayesian analyses? We present a summary of agreements and disagreements of the authors on several discussion points regarding Bayesian inference. We also provide a thinking guideline to assist researchers in conducting Bayesian inference in the social and behavioural sciences.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Psychology
Publisher: Nature Publishing Group
ISSN: 2397-3374
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 14 November 2019
Date of Acceptance: 23 October 2019
Last Modified: 26 Oct 2022 10:18

Citation Data

Cited 23 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics