Discussion points for Bayesian inference

Aczel, Balazs, Hoekstra, Rink, Gelman, Andrew, Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan, Klugkist, Irene G., Rouder, Jeffrey N., Vandekerckhove, Joachim, Lee, Michael D., Morey, Richard D. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9220-3179, Vanpaemel, Wolf, Dienes, Zoltan and Ravenzwaaij, Don van 2020. Discussion points for Bayesian inference. Nature Human Behaviour 4 , pp. 561-563. 10.1038/s41562-019-0807-z

Preview

PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version Download (142kB) | Preview

Abstract

Why is there no consensual way of conducting Bayesian analyses? We present a summary of agreements and disagreements of the authors on several discussion points regarding Bayesian inference. We also provide a thinking guideline to assist researchers in conducting Bayesian inference in the social and behavioural sciences.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Psychology
Publisher:	Nature Publishing Group
ISSN:	2397-3374
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	14 November 2019
Date of Acceptance:	23 October 2019
Last Modified:	27 Nov 2024 18:00
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/126822

Citation Data

Cited 35 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item