Kido, Hiroyuki ![]() ![]() |
Preview |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (591kB) | Preview |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63558-3_14
Abstract
This paper addresses the problem concerning approximating human cognitions and semantic extensions regarding acceptability status of arguments. We introduce three types of logical equilibriums in terms of satisfiability, entailment and semantic equivalence in order to analyse balance of human cognitions and semantic extensions. The generality of our proposal is shown by the existence conditions of equilibrium solutions. The applicability of our proposal is demonstrated by the fact that it detects a flaw of argumentation actually taking place in an online forum and suggests its possible resolution.
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (Paper) |
---|---|
Date Type: | Published Online |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Computer Science & Informatics |
Publisher: | Springer Verlag |
ISSN: | 0302-9743 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 10 December 2019 |
Date of Acceptance: | 31 May 2017 |
Last Modified: | 19 May 2023 13:39 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/127448 |
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |