Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

The power to define resilience in social–hydrological systems: toward a power‐sensitive resilience framework

Dewulf, Art, Karpouzoglou, Timos, Warner, Jeroen, Wesselink, Anna, Mao, Feng ORCID:, Vos, Geroen, Tamas, Peter, Grot, Annemarie E., Heijmans, Annelies, Ahmed, Farhana, Hoang, Long, Vij, Sumit and Buytaert, Wouter 2019. The power to define resilience in social–hydrological systems: toward a power‐sensitive resilience framework. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water 6 (6) , e1377. 10.1002/wat2.1377

[thumbnail of wat2.1377.pdf] PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (1MB)


Since the early work on defining and analyzing resilience in domains such as engineering, ecology and psychology, the concept has gained significant traction in many fields of research and practice. It has also become a very powerful justification for various policy goals in the water sector, evident in terms like flood resilience, river resilience, and water resilience. At the same time, a substantial body of literature has developed that questions the resilience concept's systems ontology, natural science roots and alleged conservatism, and criticizes resilience thinking for not addressing power issues. In this study, we review these critiques with the aim to develop a framework for power‐sensitive resilience analysis. We build on the three faces of power to conceptualize the power to define resilience. We structure our discussion of the relevant literature into five questions that need to be reflected upon when applying the resilience concept to social–hydrological systems. These questions address: (a) resilience of what, (b) resilience at what scale, (c) resilience to what, (d) resilience for what purpose, and (e) resilience for whom; and the implications of the political choices involved in defining these parameters for resilience building or analysis. Explicitly considering these questions enables making political choices explicit in order to support negotiation or contestation on how resilience is defined and used.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Earth and Environmental Sciences
Publisher: Wiley
ISSN: 2049-1948
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 27 July 2020
Date of Acceptance: 24 July 2019
Last Modified: 05 May 2023 12:15

Citation Data

Cited 21 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics