Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Escalating complexity and fragmentation of mental health service systems: the role of recovery as a form of moral communication

Weaver, Nicholas 2022. Escalating complexity and fragmentation of mental health service systems: the role of recovery as a form of moral communication. Kybernetes 51 (5) , pp. 1800-1813. 10.1108/K-11-2020-0782

[thumbnail of Escalating complexity and fragmentation of mental health service systems - the role of recovery as a form of moral communication ACCEPTED POST-PRINT.pdf]
PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (359kB) | Preview


Purpose Theoretical generalisation provides the basis for tackling problems of service complexity, fragmentation and disrupted care pathways. Design/methodology/approach Recent mental health service transformation in Wales, United Kingdom, has been stimulated by a policy programme underpinned by person-centred recovery values. This paper offers analysis informed by the perspectives of Niklas Luhmann and other noted theorists to examine escalating service system complexity related to this transformation. Analysis builds upon the findings of a qualitative study employing thematic discourse analysis of talk of people with mental illness and associated workers. Findings In total, three themes were constructed in participants' talk: “Competing versions of recovery”, “Misaligned service expectations” and “Disrupted care pathways.” Recovery may be understood as a form of moral communication and autopoietic meaning-making activity, according to Luhmann's radical constructionist epistemology. This has the potential to generate competing versions of recovery, a key contributor to escalating complexity. Research limitations/implications Findings could be developed further by continued investigation of the relationship between recovery implementation and service fragmentation. Social implications A more judicious, balanced policy-implementation may cultivate optimal conditions for recovery pluralism by avoiding polarisation towards either top-down, policy-based recovery implementation or a proliferation of approaches at the grassroots level. Findings have implications for healthcare settings beyond the scope of mental healthcare, given the prevalence of person-centred care internationally. Originality/value A simplistic view of recovery implementation should be challenged. Recovery should not be considered a “magic bullet” for mental healthcare delivery. Haphazard recovery-implementation may have detrimental effects of escalating complexity, service fragmentation and disrupted care pathways.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Healthcare Sciences
Additional Information: Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial International Licence 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0)
Publisher: Emerald
ISSN: 0368-492X
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 25 May 2021
Date of Acceptance: 31 March 2021
Last Modified: 11 May 2022 17:40

Citation Data

Cited 1 time in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics