Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Acoustic analysis of the effect of personal protective equipment on speech understanding: lessons for clinical environments

Mcleod, Robert W.J. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3221-6896, Gallagher, Maria, Hall, Andy, Bant, Sarah P. and Culling, John F. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1107-9802 2023. Acoustic analysis of the effect of personal protective equipment on speech understanding: lessons for clinical environments. International Journal of Audiology 62 (7) , pp. 682-687. 10.1080/14992027.2022.2070780

[thumbnail of Culling. Acoustic analysis of the effect.pdf] PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial.

Download (480kB)

Abstract

Objective The use of various types of filtering facepiece class 3 (FFP3) mask have become commonplace since the Covid-19 outbreak. These have been evaluated in terms of efficacy regarding aerosol filtration but less emphasis has been placed on the acoustic effects of such masks and their consequences for clinical communication. Design A microphone 65 cm from a sound-producing Head and Torso Simulator (wearing the masks) was used to measure attenuation via a tone sweep. Predicted impact on speech reception in noise was assessed by weighting the attenuations of cochlear excitation patterns by the frequency importance function of the Speech Intelligibility Index. Study sample We evaluated acoustic attenuation properties of seven FFP3 masks and a Type IIR surgical mask (as a comparator). Results The Type IIR mask had the smallest impact on SNR (2.6 dB with visor). Most FFP3s with an addition of a visor (if not already face covering) impacted SNR by approximately 6 dB. The 3 M 6000 was significantly worse (15.8 dB). Conclusions Mouth-and-nose covering FFP3s masks had similar effects on SNR (≈6.2 dB with visor). The Tecmen TM-H2 had several advantages over other masks evaluated. It was reusable, allowed lipreading clues and the attenuation was similar to other FFP3s.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Psychology
Publisher: Informa Healthcare
ISSN: 1499-2027
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 6 May 2022
Date of Acceptance: 21 April 2022
Last Modified: 05 Jan 2024 17:16
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/149563

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics