Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Interventions to promote physical distancing behaviour during infectious disease pandemics or epidemics: A systematic review

Epton, Tracy, Ghio, Daniela, Ballard, Lisa M., Allen, Sarah F., Kassianos, Angelos P., Hewitt, Rachael, Swainston, Katherine, Fynn, Wendy Irene, Rowland, Vickie, Westbrook, Juliette, Jenkinson, Elizabeth, Morrow, Alison, McGeechan, Grant J., Stanescu, Sabina, Yousuf, Aysha A., Sharma, Nisha, Begum, Suhana, Karasouli, Eleni, Scanlan, Daniel, Shorter, Gillian W., Arden, Madelynne A., Armitage, Christopher J., O'Connor, Daryl B., Kamal, Atiya, McBride, Emily, Swanson, Vivien, Hart, Jo, Byrne-Davis, Lucie, Chater, Angel and Drury, John 2022. Interventions to promote physical distancing behaviour during infectious disease pandemics or epidemics: A systematic review. Social Science & Medicine 303 , 114946. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.114946

[thumbnail of 1-s2.0-S0277953622002520-main.pdf] PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (945kB)

Abstract

Objectives Physical distancing, defined as keeping 1–2m apart when co-located, can prevent cases of droplet or aerosol transmitted infectious diseases such as SARS-CoV2. During the COVID-19 pandemic, distancing was a recommendation or a requirement in many countries. This systematic review aimed to determine which interventions and behavior change techniques (BCTs) are effective in promoting adherence to distancing and through which potential mechanisms of action (MOAs). Methods Six databases were searched. The review included studies that were (a) conducted on humans, (b) reported physical distancing interventions, (c) included any comparator (e.g., pre-intervention versus post-intervention; randomized controlled trial), and (d) reported actual distancing or predictors of distancing behavior. Risk of bias was assessed using the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool. BCTs and potential MoAs were identified in each intervention. Results Six articles (with seven studies and 19 comparisons) indicated that distancing interventions could successfully change MoAs and behavior. Successful BCTs (MoAs) included feedback on behavior (e.g., motivation); information about health consequences, salience of health consequences (e.g., beliefs about consequences), demonstration (e.g., beliefs about capabilities), and restructuring the physical environment (e.g., environmental context and resources). The most promising interventions were proximity buzzers, directional systems, and posters with loss-framed messages that demonstrated the behaviors. Conclusions The evidence indicates several BCTs and potential MoAs that should be targeted in interventions and highlights gaps that should be the focus of future research.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Healthcare Sciences
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 0277-9536
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 18 July 2022
Date of Acceptance: 22 March 2022
Last Modified: 23 May 2023 23:14
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/151349

Citation Data

Cited 1 time in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics