We need timely access to mental health data: implications of the Goldacre review

Astle, Duncan E, Moore, Anna, Marryat, Louise, Viding, Essi, Mansfield, Karen L, Fazel, Mina, Pierce, Matthias, Abel, Kathryn M, Green, Jonathan, John, Ann, Broome, Matthew R, Upthegrove, Rachel, Bould, Helen, Minnis, Helen, Gajwani, Ruchika, Groom, Madeleine J, Hollis, Chris, Liddle, Elizabeth, Sayal, Kapil, Berry, Vashti, Collishaw, Stephan ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4296-820X, Dawes, Helen, Cortese, Samuele, Violato, Mara, Pollard, Jack, MacCabe, James H, Blakemore, Sarah-Jayne, Simonoff, Emily, Watkins, Edward, Hiller, Rachel M, Townsend, Ellen, Armour, Cherie, Geddes, John R, Thompson, Lucy, Schwannauer, Matthias, Nicholls, Dasha, Hotopf, Matthew, Downs, Johnny, Rahman, Atif, Sharma, Aditya Narain and Ford, Tamsin J 2023. We need timely access to mental health data: implications of the Goldacre review. The Lancet Psychiatry 10 (4) , pp. 242-244. 10.1016/S2215-0366(23)00030-5

Preview

PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version Download (162kB) | Preview

Abstract

The Goldacre review, published in April, 2022, 1 is a landmark evaluation of the use, availability, and safety of National Health Service (NHS) data across all four nations of the UK. The review underscores the necessary role of data in driving health-care improvement and innovation, and the potential risks inherent in using data routinely contributed by health service users. The review recommends a radical overhaul in NHS data curation, access, and analysis, and, crucially, argues that substantial new resources must be marshalled to make this aspiration a reality.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Published Online
Status:	Published
Schools:	Medicine
Publisher:	Elsevier
ISSN:	2215-0366
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	14 April 2023
Date of Acceptance:	1 February 2023
Last Modified:	30 Oct 2023 02:30
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/158868

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item