Seeger, Rena, Udoh, Ubong, Dewar, Brian, Nicholls, Stuart, Fedyk, Mark, Fahed, Robert, Perry, Jeff, Hill, Michael D., Menon, Bijoy, Swartz, Richard H., Poppe, Alexandre Y., Gocan, Sophia, Brehaut, Jamie, Dainty, Katie, Shepherd, Victoria ![]() ![]() |
Preview |
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (228kB) | Preview |
Abstract
dvance consent could allow individuals at high risk of stroke to provide consent before they might become eligible for enrollment in acute stroke trials. This survey explores the acceptability of this novel technique to Canadian Research Ethics Board (REB) chairs that review acute stroke trials. Responses from 15 REB chairs showed that majority of respondents expressed comfort approving studies that adopt advance consent. There was no clear preference for advance consent over deferral of consent, although respondents expressed significant concern with broad rather than trial-specific advance consent. These findings shed light on the acceptability of advance consent to Canadian ethics regulators.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Published Online |
Status: | In Press |
Schools: | Medicine Centre for Trials Research (CNTRR) |
Publisher: | Cambridge University Press |
ISSN: | 0317-1671 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 5 September 2023 |
Date of Acceptance: | 22 June 2023 |
Last Modified: | 07 Sep 2023 11:42 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/162243 |
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |