Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Outcome measures for the evaluation of treatment response in hidradenitis suppurativa for clinical practice

Mastacouris, Nicole, Tannenbaum, Rachel, Strunk, Andrew, Koptyev, Jonathan, Aarts, Pim, Alhusayen, Raed, Bechara, Falk G., Benhadou, Farida, Bettoli, Vincenzo, Brassard, Alain, Brown, Debra, Choon, Siew Eng, Coutts, Patricia, da Silva, Dimitri Luz Felipe, Daveluy, Steven, Dellavalle, Robert P., del Marmol, Veronique, Emtestam, Lennart, Gebauer, Kurt, George, Ralph, Giamarellos-Bourboulis, Evangelos J., Goldfarb, Noah, Hamzavi, Iltefat, Hazen, Paul G., Horváth, Barbara, Hsiao, Jennifer, Ingram, John R. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5257-1142, Jemec, Gregor B. E., Kirby, Joslyn S., Lowes, Michelle A., Marzano, Angelo V., Matusiak, Lukasz, Naik, Haley B., Okun, Martin M., Oon, Hazel H., Orenstein, Lauren A. V., Paek, So Yeon, Pascual, José C., Fernandez-Peñas, Pablo, Resnik, Barry I., Sayed, Christopher J., Thorlacius, Linnea, van der Zee, Hessel H., van Straalen, Kelsey R. and Garg, Amit 2023. Outcome measures for the evaluation of treatment response in hidradenitis suppurativa for clinical practice. JAMA Dermatology 159 (11) , pp. 1258-1266. 10.1001/jamadermatol.2023.3282

[thumbnail of Accepted manuscript.pdf]
Preview
PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (652kB) | Preview

Abstract

Importance Although several clinician- and patient-reported outcome measures have been developed for trials in hidradenitis suppurativa (HS), there is currently no consensus on which measures are best suited for use in clinical practice. Identifying validated and feasible measures applicable to the practice setting has the potential to optimize treatment strategies and generate generalizable evidence that may inform treatment guidelines. Objective To establish consensus on a core set of clinician- and patient-reported outcome measures recommended for use in clinical practice and to establish the appropriate interval within which these measures should be applied. Evidence Review Clinician- and patient-reported HS measures and studies describing their psychometric properties were identified through literature reviews. Identified measures comprised an item reduction survey and subsequent electronic Delphi (e-Delphi) consensus rounds. In each consensus round, a summary of outcome measure components and scoring methods was provided to participants. Experts were provided with feasibility characteristics of clinician measures to aid selection. Consensus was achieved if at least 67% of respondents agreed with use of a measure in clinical practice. Findings Among HS experts, response rates for item reduction, e-Delphi round 1, and e-Delphi round 2 surveys were 76.4% (42 of 55), 90.5% (38 of 42), and 92.9% (39 of 42), respectively; among patient research partners (PRPs), response rates were 70.8% (17 of 24), 100% (17 of 17), and 82.4% (14 of 17), respectively. The majority of experts across rounds were practicing dermatologists with 18 to 19 years of clinical experience. In the final e-Delphi round, most PRPs were female (12 [85.7%] vs 2 males [11.8%]) and aged 30 to 49 years. In the final e-Delphi round, HS experts and PRPs agreed with the use of the HS Investigator Global Assessment (28 [71.8%]) and HS Quality of Life score (13 [92.9%]), respectively. The most expert-preferred assessment interval in which to apply these measures was 3 months (27 [69.2%]). Conclusions and Relevance An international group of HS experts and PRPs achieved consensus on a core set of HS measures suitable for use in clinical practice. Consistent use of these measures may lead to more accurate assessments of HS disease activity and life outcomes, facilitating shared treatment decision-making in the practice setting.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Medicine
Publisher: American Medical Association
ISSN: 2168-6068
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 22 October 2023
Date of Acceptance: 27 September 2023
Last Modified: 04 Dec 2023 19:32
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/163354

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics