Mechanisms of skillful interaction: sensorimotor enactivism & mechanistic explanation

Lee, Jonny and Millar, Becky 2024. Mechanisms of skillful interaction: sensorimotor enactivism & mechanistic explanation. Philosophical Psychology 10.1080/09515089.2024.2302509 Item availability restricted.

PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version Restricted to Repository staff only until 14 August 2025 due to copyright restrictions. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (326kB)

Abstract

The mechanistic model depicts scientific explanations as involving the discovery of multi-level, organized components that constitute a target phenomenon. Meanwhile, sensorimotor enactivism purports to offer a scientifically informed account of perceptual experience as a skill-laden interactive relationship, constitutively involving both perceiver and world, rather than as an agent-bound representation of the world. Insofar as sensorimotor enactivism identifies an empirically tractable phenomenon – skillful agent-world interaction – and mechanistic explanation establishes the subpersonal components of this phenomenon, the two approaches allow for a fruitful division of labor in investigating perceptual experience. On closer inspection, however, two challenges arise. First, the “representation challenge” arises because promising attempts to set out implementational details of our sensorimotor interaction with the world implicate cognitive representations, creating tension with sensorimotor enactivism’s nonrepresentational commitments. Second, the “reconstitution challenge” arises when mechanistic explanation not only uncovers the components of some established phenomenon but plays a role in “reconstituting” this phenomenon. This means that, through investigating mechanisms, perceptual experience may be reconceived such that its constituents are wholly organism-bound. We explore both challenges to the compatibility of mechanism and sensorimotor enactivism and examine possible solutions. The result is a clearer understanding of the tensions and opportunities for learning between the frameworks.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Published Online
Status:	In Press
Schools:	English, Communication and Philosophy
Publisher:	Taylor and Francis Group
ISSN:	0951-5089
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	13 March 2024
Last Modified:	13 Mar 2024 19:35
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/166902

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item