Effective interventions to increase representation of under-served groups in randomised trials in UK and Ireland: a scoping literature review

Biggs, Katie, Dix, Caroline, Shiely, Frances, Treweek, Shaun, Shepherd, Victoria ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7687-0817, Lane, Athene, Green, Heidi, Isaacs, Talia, Willis, Andrew and Cooper, Cindy 2024. Effective interventions to increase representation of under-served groups in randomised trials in UK and Ireland: a scoping literature review. NIHR Open Research 4 , 12. 10.3310/nihropenres.13524.1

Preview

PDF - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Background: Participants in clinical trials often do not reflect the populations that could benefit from the treatments being investigated. There are known barriers to trial participation for under-served groups, but limited evidence on strategies to alleviate these barriers to improve representation. This scoping review aimed to identify effective interventions and design features that improve the representation `of under-served groups in trials, focusing on the UK and Ireland. Methods: We included methodological research studies that reported interventions to improve representation of ethnic minority groups, socioeconomically disadvantaged groups, older people, or those with impaired capacity to consent to randomised controlled trials, conducted in the UK and Ireland, published between 2000–2021. Systematic searches were conducted in November 2021 and data were independently extracted by two authors and narratively synthesised. Results: Seven studies were included: one randomised controlled study embedded in five trials, one mixed-methods study, and five studies reporting ‘lessons learnt’ from one trial. We categorised the 47 reported interventions or strategies into nine broad themes: Recruitment sites, recruitment settings, community engagement, and communication with participants, incentives, inclusion criteria, flexibility, patient documentation, and the consent process. Only 28/47 interventions were evaluated, 23 of which were comparison of recruitment pathways. The randomised study found that a £100 incentive mentioned in the invitation letter increased positive responses overall across drug trials in cardiovascular disease and hypertension, but not for older people or those living in the most deprived areas. Invitation letters via GPs and working with communities were reported as successful recruitment pathways in recruiting different under-served populations. Conclusions: Interventions aiming to improve the recruitment of under-served groups in the UK and Ireland were reported across seven papers, but their effectiveness was rarely rigorously evaluated. Included studies were context specific. Using a variety of recruitment methods is likely to help achieve a more diverse cohort.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Published Online
Status:	In Press
Schools:	Centre for Trials Research (CNTRR)
Publisher:	Taylor and Francis
ISSN:	2633-4402
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	4 April 2024
Date of Acceptance:	25 March 2024
Last Modified:	22 Apr 2024 13:45
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/167709

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item