Sandberg, Russell ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4310-9677
2024.
Say a prayer for Article 9? R (on the Application of TTT) v Michaela School and the question of interference.
Law and Justice
Item availability restricted. |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Restricted to Repository staff only until 1 January 2025 due to copyright restrictions. Download (217kB) |
Abstract
This article considers the High Court judgment in R (on the Application of TTT) v Michaela School in which the school’s ban on ritual prayer was held not to breach Article 9 ECHR and equality legislation. This article focuses on how the High Court dealt with the Article 9 claim, in particular the question of whether there had been an interference with the claimant’s right to manifest her religion or belief under Article 9(1). It contends that the restrictive approach to the question of interference was incorrect as a matter of principle, questionable as a matter of law and unnecessary given the High Court’s findings as the other grounds argued. An earlier version of this article appeared on the Law and Religion UK blog. A Spanish language version will appear in Revista General de Derecho Canonico y Derecho Eclesiastico del Estado.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Published Online |
Status: | In Press |
Schools: | Law Cardiff Law & Politics |
Subjects: | K Law > KD England and Wales |
Publisher: | Edmund Plowden Trust |
ISSN: | 0269-817X |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 6 June 2024 |
Date of Acceptance: | 30 April 2024 |
Last Modified: | 28 Jul 2024 12:58 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/168492 |
Actions (repository staff only)
Edit Item |