Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Beyond technocracy: a systematic review of individual policy capacity in the Westminster tradition

Collins, Matthew ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7458-3593 2026. Beyond technocracy: a systematic review of individual policy capacity in the Westminster tradition. Policy Studies 10.1080/01442872.2026.2710097

[thumbnail of Beyond technocracy  a systematic review of individual policy capacity in the Westminster tradition.pdf]
Preview
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives.

Download (1MB) | Preview

Abstract

Research on policy advisory capacity has expanded rapidly but has tended to focus on the system rather than the individual. This systematic review investigates what knowledge, skills, experience, and dispositions individual policy advisers in the Westminster tradition require. Peer-reviewed studies of Westminster jurisdictions published between January 2000 and December 2024 were searched in Scopus, combining the paired term "Civil Service" and "Skills" with "Policy Capacity", "Civil Service Skills", and "Policy Advisory Skills" (n=75). These were thematically analysed, guided by Collins and Evans's (2007) categorisation of expertise, to produce an integrated typology: three types of knowledge (specialised policy, general policy, and system); four skill domains (policy-making, relational, communication, and integrative balancing); two experiential dimensions (lived experience of users and occupational culture); and seven dispositions (political astuteness, creativity, judgement, leadership, adaptive capacity, risk-taking, and resilience). A significant limitation is the absence of the ministerial perspective from the literature, despite ministers being the preeminent consumers of policy advice. The article concludes that individual policy capacity is socially constructed, institutionally conditioned, and politically situated; that competency-based models cannot capture its relational character; and that it emerges from the interaction of technical expertise, political judgement, relational capacity, and organisational context.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Published Online
Status: In Press
Schools: Schools > Social Sciences (Includes Criminology and Education)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General)
J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
J Political Science > JN Political institutions (Europe) > JN101 Great Britain
Uncontrolled Keywords: Individual policy capacity civil service public administration British politics systematic review
Additional Information: Cardiff OA Ref: 2026-OA-0666.
Publisher: Taylor and Francis Group
ISSN: 0144-2872
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 29 July 2026
Date of Acceptance: 18 July 2026
Last Modified: 30 Jul 2026 09:30
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/188601

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics