Axial length to corneal curvature ratio is insufficient for detecting pseudomyopia in children: a multi-cohort study

Bui, Huyen T., van Hemert, Dirk J., Peng, Tianli, Yang, Shuhui, Nguyen, Hai-Yen T., Noor, Hannah, Harrington, Siofra C., Terry, Louise ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6200-8230 and Guggenheim, Jeremy A. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5164-340X 2026. Axial length to corneal curvature ratio is insufficient for detecting pseudomyopia in children: a multi-cohort study. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics 10.1007/s44402-026-00185-2

PDF - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (2MB)

Abstract

Purpose Pseudomyopia is an accommodative disorder that can be identified by the difference between pre- and post-cycloplegic refractive error. The current study aimed to evaluate whether the axial length to corneal curvature (AL/CR) ratio, in conjunction with non-cycloplegic refractive error, can reliably identify pseudomyopia in children, thus avoiding the need for cycloplegia. Methods Refractive error and biometry data from longitudinal studies based in Denmark (n = 645; age 7–17 years) and China (Anyang Childhood Eye Study; n = 2487; age 6–13 years) were used to train separate linear mixed models for children of European or East Asian ancestry, respectively, with AL/CR ratio as outcome and cycloplegic spherical equivalent refractive error (SER), age and sex as predictors. The models could be used to calculate the AL/CR 95% prediction interval in a child of known age, sex and non-cycloplegic SER; if the child’s AL/CR fell below the lower limit of the AL/CR 95% prediction interval, then the child was classified as pseudomyopic. The European and East Asian models were externally validated using data from participants of the Ireland Eye Study (IES; n = 92) and Sydney Myopia Study (SMS; n = 686) cohorts, and the Hong Kong Children Eye Study (HKCES; n = 9519) and Vietnam (n = 1165) cohorts, respectively. Results The European model demonstrated moderate detection accuracy for pseudomyopia: sensitivity = 0.82 (IES) and 0.81 (SMS); specificity = 0.75 in both cohorts. By contrast, the East Asian model performed poorly: sensitivity = 0.22 (HKCES) and 0.13 (Vietnam); specificity = 0.99 in both cohorts. Conclusions Despite moderate diagnostic performance in European samples, the current AL/CR-based models lacked sufficient accuracy for screening and performed poorly in East Asian children, suggesting that AL/CR is not a reliable non-cycloplegic marker of pseudomyopia. Further studies incorporating additional ocular biometric parameters and employing a more rigorous definition of pseudomyopia may build on these initial findings.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Published Online
Status:	In Press
Schools:	Schools > Optometry and Vision Sciences
Additional Information:	Full list of authors available: https://doi.org/10.1007/s44402-026-00185-2
Publisher:	Wiley
ISSN:	0275-5408
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	21 September 2026
Date of Acceptance:	26 August 2026
Last Modified:	21 Sep 2026 13:05
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/189726

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item