Rolston and Hayes on environmental virtue ethics: Intrinsic natural value, moral motivation, and human-nature relationships

Attfield, Robin 2026. Rolston and Hayes on environmental virtue ethics: Intrinsic natural value, moral motivation, and human-nature relationships. Studia Ecologiae et Bioethicae 10.21697/seb.5907

PDF - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution No Derivatives. Download (272kB)

Abstract

Environmental virtue ethics represents one of the major approaches within contemporary environmental philosophy, addressing the moral foundations of human relationships with the natural world. Charles Hayes recently presented a defence of environmental virtue ethics in response to criticisms of this stance from Holmes Rolston III. After an outline of Rolston’s criticisms, Hayes’ argument is depicted, including certain frameworks about motivation which he shows to be deficient, and which he also attributes to Rolston. I proceed to question Hayes’ implicit assumption that to act rightly is to do what the virtuous person would do, to contest his attribution of these deficient frameworks about motivation to Rolston, and to endorse Rolston’s account of what makes right actions right and meaningful lives meaningful. I also question the view that either virtuous lives or environment-oriented lives are self-justifying, since the actions performed by those who live such lives can (and often do) fail to be morally right.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Published Online
Status:	In Press
Schools:	Schools > Global Humanities Schools > English, Communication and Philosophy
Publisher:	Wydawnictwo Naukowe Uniwersytetu Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego w Warszawie
ISSN:	1733-1218
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	8 October 2026
Last Modified:	08 Oct 2026 11:00
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/190087

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item