Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

The Impact of Race on the Adjudication of Sexual Assault and other Violent Crimes

Maxwell, Christopher D., Robinson, Amanda L. ORCID: and Post, Lori A. 2003. The Impact of Race on the Adjudication of Sexual Assault and other Violent Crimes. Journal of Criminal Justice 31 (6) , pp. 523-538. 10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2003.08.005

Full text not available from this repository.


This study assessed whether sexual assault offenders were differently adjudicated from other violent felons and to what extent any differences in adjudication decisions were explained by the defendant's race. Five court decisions were analyzed using a weighted sample of 41,151 cases adjudicated between 1990 and 1996 that were representative of cases in the seventy-five most populous United States counties. The results did not support the hypothesis that sexual assault cases were given, on average, more leniency than less serious violent offenses, however, various adjudication decisions for the four violent offenses were moderated by the defendant's race. Interaction models showed minorities were treated more punitively compared to Whites when they were charged with an assault, robbery, or murder, but they were treated more leniently when they were charged with a sexual assault. Explanatory models that accounted for the differential processing of minorities that were disproportionately lenient or punitive, depending on the crime, are discussed.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Social Sciences (Includes Criminology and Education)
Subjects: K Law > KF United States Federal Law
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 0047-2352
Last Modified: 17 Oct 2022 09:23

Citation Data

Cited 29 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item