Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000)

Jones, Dylan Marc ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8783-5542 and Tremblay, Sebastien 2000. Interference in memory by process or content? A reply to Neath (2000). Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 7 (3) , pp. 550-558. 10.3758/BF03214370

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

The approach to the irrelevant sound effect by Neath (2000) is discussed in terms of the contrast between content-based and process-based interference. Four themes are highlighted: First, problematic features of the feature model are highlighted; second, results not considered by Neath are presented; third, empirical underpinnings of the feature model not related to the irrelevant-sound effect are questioned; last, the parsimony of the feature model is questioned. The balance of the evidence seems to be in favor of a process-based approach, on the grounds that it provides a comprehensive account of acoustic and taskbased factors within the irrelevant sound effect, for both speech and nonspeech sound.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Psychology
Subjects:	B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
Publisher:	Springer
ISSN:	1069-9384
Last Modified:	21 Oct 2022 09:08
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/35412

Citation Data

Cited 111 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item