Ivic, Ana, Onyeaka, Helen, Girling, Alan, Brewis, Ian Andrew, Ola, Bolarinde, Hammadieh, Nahed, Papaioannou, Spyros and Barratt, Christopher L. R. 2002. Critical evaluation of methylcellulose as an alternative medium in sperm migration tests. Human Reproduction 17 (1) , pp. 143-149. 10.1093/humrep/17.1.143 |
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to evaluate the ability of human spermatozoa to penetrate methylcellulose (MC) and to compare this with penetration in hyaluronic acid. METHODS: Spermatozoa from normal (≥20×106 sperm/ml, ≥50% progressive motility, ≥5% normal forms) and oligozoospermic (<20×106 sperm/ml) semen samples were allowed to swim into glass capillary tubes containing methylcellulose with a viscosity of 15 centipoise (cp) (MC15) and 4000 cp (MC4000), hyaluronic acid (rooster comb) or Sperm Select. Penetration of the spermatozoa at 1, 2, 3 and 4 cm were correlated with basic semen parameters (concentration, motility and morphology). The effects of temperature on penetration into MC4000 were explored at 17–37°C. RESULTS: Higher numbers of spermatozoa penetrated MC4000 (10 mg/ml) compared with MC15 and the hyaluronic acid preparations. There was a highly significant correlation between the number of spermatozoa at all migration distances in MC4000 (10 mg/ml) and semen parameters. Increases in temperature from 17–37°C were accompanied by significantly higher numbers of spermatozoa at each penetration distance. MC4000 at 10 mg/ml was at least as favourable to sperm penetration as human cervical mucus. Effective discrimination between normal and abnormal samples was achieved using MC4000 (10 mg/ml). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest the potential use of methylcellulose (MC4000, 10 mg/ml) as a reproducible and effective alternative to hyaluronic acid in sperm migration tests.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Medicine |
Subjects: | R Medicine > R Medicine (General) |
Publisher: | Oxford University Press |
ISSN: | 1460-2350 |
Last Modified: | 04 Jun 2017 06:13 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/57399 |
Citation Data
Cited 48 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
Edit Item |