Thomas, Gareth Martin ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4959-2337 2016. An elephant in the consultation room? Configuring Down Syndrome in British antenatal care. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 30 (2) , pp. 238-258. 10.1111/maq.12222 |
Preview |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (241kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article is based on an ethnographic study of prenatal screening for Down syndrome in two British healthcare institutions. Drawing on observations of everyday hospital life and interviews with healthcare professionals, I identify how a discussion of Down syndrome is avoided within prenatal screening consultations. This relative silence is created and upheld owing to three observations: 1) the British public is interpreted as “knowing” what Down syndrome is; 2) the organization of care dictates that the condition is not classified as important enough to justify an explanation within consultations; 3) professionals frequently admit to holding minimal knowledge of Down syndrome. This absence, together with the condition being categorized as a “risk” or “problem,” helps produce and uphold its status as a negative pregnancy outcome. I conclude by highlighting the contributions that this article has for anthropologically exploring how ideas around disability intersect with the proliferation of reproductive technologies.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Centre for Economic and Social Aspects of Genomics (CESAGen) Healthcare Sciences Medicine Social Sciences (Includes Criminology and Education) |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) H Social Sciences > HM Sociology R Medicine > R Medicine (General) R Medicine > RT Nursing |
Publisher: | American Anthropological Association |
ISSN: | 0745-5194 |
Funders: | Economic and Social Research Council |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 30 March 2016 |
Date of Acceptance: | 11 May 2015 |
Last Modified: | 17 Nov 2024 23:45 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/73094 |
Citation Data
Cited 9 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
Edit Item |