Healy, Davig, Blenkinsop, Thomas G. ![]() |
Preview |
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (3MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Conjugate, or bimodal, fault patterns dominate the geological literature on shear failure. Based on Anderson's (1905) application of the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion, these patterns have been interpreted from all tectonic regimes, including normal, strike-slip and thrust (reverse) faulting. However, a fundamental limitation of the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion – and others that assume faults form parallel to the intermediate principal stress, σ2 – is that only plane strain can result from slip on the conjugate faults. However, deformation in the Earth is widely accepted as being three-dimensional, with truly triaxial stresses (σ1 > σ2 > σ3) and strains. Polymodal faulting, with three or more sets of faults forming and slipping simultaneously, can generate three-dimensional strains from truly triaxial stresses. Laboratory experiments and outcrop studies have verified the occurrence of polymodal fault patterns in nature. These fault patterns present a fundamental challenge to our understanding of shear failure in rocks (and other materials) and an opportunity to improve our understanding of seismic hazards and fluid flow in the subsurface. In this review, we assess the published evidence, theories and models for polymodal faulting before suggesting ways to produce a truly general and valid failure criterion for triaxial failure.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Earth and Environmental Sciences |
Subjects: | Q Science > QE Geology |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Fault; Pattern; Polymodal; Quadrimodal; Conjugate; Failure |
Additional Information: | Available online 3 September 2015 |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
ISSN: | 0191-8141 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 30 March 2016 |
Date of Acceptance: | 30 August 2015 |
Last Modified: | 02 May 2023 23:45 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/76522 |
Citation Data
Cited 49 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |