Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Ordinary risks and accepted fictions: how contrasting and competing priorities work in risk assessment and mental health care planning

Coffey, Michael, Cohen, Rachel, Faulkner, Alison, Hannigan, Ben ORCID:, Simpson, Alan and Barlow, Sally 2017. Ordinary risks and accepted fictions: how contrasting and competing priorities work in risk assessment and mental health care planning. Health Expectations 20 (3) , pp. 471-483. 10.1111/hex.12474

[thumbnail of Coffey et al (2016).pdf]
PDF - Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution.

Download (163kB) | Preview


Background Communication and information sharing are considered crucial to recovery-focused mental health services. Effective mental health care planning and coordination includes assessment and management of risk and safety. Objective Using data from our cross-national mixed-method study of care planning and coordination, we examined what patients, family members and workers say about risk assessment and management and explored the contents of care plans. Design Thematic analysis of qualitative research interviews (n = 117) with patients, family members and workers, across four English and two Welsh National Health Service sites. Care plans were reviewed (n = 33) using a structured template. Findings Participants have contrasting priorities in relation to risk. Patients see benefit in discussions about risk, but cast the process as a worker priority that may lead to loss of liberty. Relationships with workers are key to family members and patients; however, worker claims of involving people in the care planning process do not extend to risk assessment and management procedures for fear of causing upset. Workers locate risk as coming from the person rather than social or environmental factors, are risk averse and appear to prioritize the procedural aspects of assessment. Conclusions Despite limitations, risk assessment is treated as legitimate work by professionals. Risk assessment practice operates as a type of fiction in which poor predictive ability and fear of consequences are accepted in the interests of normative certainty by all parties. As a consequence, risk adverse options are encouraged by workers and patients steered away from opportunities for ordinary risks thereby hindering the mobilization of their strengths and abilities.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Healthcare Sciences
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Uncontrolled Keywords: care coordination; care planning; COCAPP ; mental health; recovery; risk
Publisher: Wiley
ISSN: 1369-6513
Funders: National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research Programme
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 5 June 2016
Date of Acceptance: 10 May 2016
Last Modified: 04 May 2023 20:56

Citation Data

Cited 47 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics