A pilot study in using argumentation frameworks for online debates

Cerutti, Federico ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0755-0358, Palmer, Alexis, Rosenfeld, Ariel, Šnajder, Jan and Toni, Francesca 2016. A pilot study in using argumentation frameworks for online debates. Presented at: First International Workshop on Systems and Algorithms for Formal Argumentation (SAFA), Potsdam, Germany, 13 September 2016. Published in: Timm, Matthias, Cerutti, Federico, Strass, Hannes and Vallati, Mauro eds. Proceedings of the First International Workshop on Systems and Algorithms for Formal Argumentation (SAFA) co-located with the 6th International Conference on Computational Models of Argument (COMMA 2016). , vol.1672 CEUR, pp. 63-74.

Preview

PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (222kB) | Preview

Abstract

We describe a pilot study in using argumentation frameworks obtained from an online debate to evaluate positions expressed in the debate. This pilot study aims at exploring the richness of Computational Argumentation methods and techniques for evaluating arguments to reason with the output of Argument Mining. It uses a hand-generated graphical representation of the debate as an intermediate representation from which argumentation frameworks can be extracted, but richer than any existing argumentation framework. The intermediate representation can provide insights for benchmark sets derived from online debates.

Item Type:	Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Computer Science & Informatics
Subjects:	Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA75 Electronic computers. Computer science
Publisher:	CEUR
ISSN:	1613-0073
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	3 October 2016
Last Modified:	01 Nov 2022 11:12
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/94157

Citation Data

Cited 6 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item