Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Relational autonomy and religious tribunals

Sandberg, Russell ORCID: and Thompson, Sharon ORCID: 2017. Relational autonomy and religious tribunals. Oxford Journal of Law and Religion 6 (1) , pp. 137-161. 10.1093/ojlr/rww059

[thumbnail of Sandberg and Thompson_Relational Autonomy and Religious Tribunals (Post-Print of Article for Oxford Journal of Law and Religion).pdf]
PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (361kB) | Preview


Academic writing on the place and status of religious tribunals in western societies has focused upon the ‘minorities within minorities’ debate: the extent to which States should intervene to ensure that the citizenship rights of female group members are protected and that religious tribunals do not discriminate on grounds of sex. In a number of recent publications following the Cardiff research on Social Cohesion and Civil Law: Marriage, Divorce and Religious Courts, it has been suggested that the concept of consent should be a key focus in determining whether the State should intervene. However, this article asks instead whether the focus should be on the question of autonomy. In particular, this article examines the need to understand the debate concerning religious tribunals within the wider context of changes within family law where an emphasis has been placed upon individual autonomy. It also compares, explores and critiques the concept of ‘relational autonomy’ as discussed by Jonathan Herring in the context of family law. We agree that developing a concept of autonomy based on the forming of relationships rather than the usual focus on the autonomy of the religious group or on the individual autonomy of those who use religious tribunals provides a way forward. However, we propose a modification of relational autonomy using relational contract theory to employ a relational approach that is ultimately rooted in contract theory. We conclude that Feminist Relational Contract Theory (FRCT) – a theory previously applied to prenuptial agreements –provides, the most appropriate framework in which power imbalances within religious tribunals can be recognised.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Law
Subjects: K Law > KD England and Wales
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISSN: 2047-0770
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 31 October 2016
Date of Acceptance: 3 October 2016
Last Modified: 03 Nov 2022 19:36

Citation Data

Cited 8 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item


Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics