Malkani, Bharat ![]() |
Abstract
Argues that the courts have erred in rejecting submissions that the right to private life can be engaged and contravened by prosecutorial policy and decision-making. Outlines prosecutorial policy and the decision-making process as regards the decision to prosecute. Examines whether the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 art.8 is applicable to prosecutorial policy and decision-making and, if it is, whether the interference with the art.8 right is lawful and justifiable. Suggests a framework for the relationship between art.8 and prosecutorial policy.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Law |
Publisher: | Sweet and Maxwell |
ISSN: | 0011-135X |
Last Modified: | 03 Nov 2022 09:32 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/105234 |
Citation Data
Cited 1 time in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |