Malkani, Bharat ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3724-2444
2011.
Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights and the decision to prosecute.
Criminal Law Review
12
, pp. 943-956.
|
Abstract
Argues that the courts have erred in rejecting submissions that the right to private life can be engaged and contravened by prosecutorial policy and decision-making. Outlines prosecutorial policy and the decision-making process as regards the decision to prosecute. Examines whether the European Convention on Human Rights 1950 art.8 is applicable to prosecutorial policy and decision-making and, if it is, whether the interference with the art.8 right is lawful and justifiable. Suggests a framework for the relationship between art.8 and prosecutorial policy.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Date Type: | Publication |
| Status: | Published |
| Schools: | Schools > Law |
| Publisher: | Sweet and Maxwell |
| ISSN: | 0011-135X |
| Last Modified: | 03 Nov 2022 09:32 |
| URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/105234 |
Citation Data
Cited 1 time in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |





CORE (COnnecting REpositories)
CORE (COnnecting REpositories)