Adapting population health interventions for new contexts: Qualitative interviews understanding the experiences, practices and challenges of researchers, funders and journal editors

Copeland, Lauren ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0387-9607, Littlecott, Hannah, Couturiaux, Danielle, Hoddinott, Pat, Segrott, Jeremy ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6215-0870, Murphy, Simon ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3589-3681, Moore, Graham ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6136-3978 and Evans, Rhiannon ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0239-6331 2022. Adapting population health interventions for new contexts: Qualitative interviews understanding the experiences, practices and challenges of researchers, funders and journal editors. BMJ Open 12 , e066451. 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-066451

Preview

PDF - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (410kB) | Preview

Abstract

Objectives Research on the adaptation of population health interventions for implementation in new contexts is rapidly expanding. This has been accompanied by a recent increase in the number of frameworks and guidance to support adaptation processes. Nevertheless, there remains limited exploration of the real-world experiences of undertaking intervention adaptation, notably the challenges encountered by different groups of stakeholders, and how these are managed. Understanding experiences is imperative in ensuring that guidance to support adaptation has practical utility. This qualitative study examines researcher and stakeholder experiences of funding, conducting and reporting adaptation research. Setting Adaptation studies. Participants Participants/cases were purposefully sampled to represent a range of adapted interventions, types of evaluations, expertise and countries. Semistructured interviews were conducted with a sample of researchers (n=23), representatives from research funding panels (n=6), journal editors (n=5) and practitioners (n=3). Measures A case study research design was used. Data were analysed using the framework approach. Overarching themes were discussed within the study team, with further iterative refinement of subthemes. Results The results generated four central themes. The first three relate to the experience of intervention adaptation (1) involving stakeholders throughout the adaptation process and how to integrate the evidence base with experience; (2) selecting the intervention and negotiating the mismatch between the original and the new context; and (3) the complexity and uncertainty when deciding the re-evaluation process. The final theme (4) reflects on participants’ experiences of using adaptation frameworks in practice, considering recommendations for future guidance development and refinement. Conclusion This study highlights the range of complexities and challenges experienced in funding, conducting and reporting research on intervention adaptation. Moving forward, guidance can be helpful in systematising processes, provided that it remains responsive to local contexts and encourage innovative practice.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Published Online
Status:	Published
Schools:	Social Sciences (Includes Criminology and Education)
Publisher:	BMJ Publishing Group
ISSN:	2044-6055
Funders:	MRC
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	20 October 2022
Date of Acceptance:	26 September 2022
Last Modified:	07 Jul 2023 04:49
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/152962

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item