Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Assessment of exhaled pathogenic droplet dispersion and indoor-outdoor exposure risk in urban street with naturally-ventilated buildings

Hang, Jian, Yang, Xia, Ou, Cuiyun, Luo, Zhiwen ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2082-3958, Fan, Xiaodan, Zhang, Xuelin, Gu, Zhongli and Li, Xianxiang 2023. Assessment of exhaled pathogenic droplet dispersion and indoor-outdoor exposure risk in urban street with naturally-ventilated buildings. Building and Environment 234 , 110122. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2023.110122

[thumbnail of BAE-D-22-04775_R1 (1).pdf]
Preview
PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (3MB) | Preview

Abstract

Outdoor droplet exposure risk is generally regarded much smaller than that indoor, but such indoor-outdoor assessment and comparison are still rare. By coupling indoor and outdoor environments, we numerically simulate the ventilation and dispersion of exhaled pathogenic droplets (e.g., diameter d = 10μm) within typical street canyon (outdoor, aspect ratio H/W = 1) and each room (indoor) of two eight-floor single-sided naturally-ventilated buildings. Inhaled fraction (IF) and suspended fraction (SF) between two face-to-face people are calculated to quantify and compare the human-to-human exposure risk in all 16 rooms (indoor) on eight floors and those at two outdoor sites. Numerical simulations are validated well by wind tunnel experiments. Results show that, the rooms in the 1st and 8th floors attain greater air change rate per hour (∼4.5–6.6h−1) and the lower exposure risk (IF∼2–4 ppm) than the 2nd-7th floors (air change rate per hour∼1.6–5.3h−1, IF∼4–11 ppm). Although inter-floor droplet dispersion exists, the room with index patient attains 2–4 order greater exposure risk than the other rooms without index patient. When the index patient stays outdoor, outdoor IF will change with locations, i.e. ∼55 ppm at leeward corner (even exceeding indoor IF∼2–11 ppm), and ∼7 ppm at middle street. Hence, the outdoor infection risk should not be ignored especially for people at leeward street corner where small vortex exists inducing local weak ventilation. Particularly, outdoor IF is decided by short-distance spraying droplet exposure (∼1m) and long-route airborne transmissions by the main recirculation through entire street canyon (∼50–100m).

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Architecture
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 0360-1323
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 22 February 2023
Date of Acceptance: 12 February 2023
Last Modified: 18 Feb 2024 02:30
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/157282

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics