Dixon, Daisy 2022. Artistic (counter) speech. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 80 (4) , pp. 409-419. 10.1093/jaac/kpac038 |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1093/jaac/kpac038
Abstract
Some visual artworks constitute hate speech because they can perform oppressive illocutionary acts. This illocution-based analysis of art reveals how responsive curation and artmaking undermines and manages problematic art. Drawing on the notion of counterspeech as an alternative tool to censorship to handle art-based hate speech, this article proposes aesthetic blocking and aesthetic spotlighting. I then show that under certain conditions, this can lead to eventual metaphysical destruction of the artwork; a way to destroy harmful art without physically destroying it.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | English, Communication and Philosophy |
Publisher: | Wiley |
ISSN: | 0021-8529 |
Date of Acceptance: | 27 July 2022 |
Last Modified: | 20 Nov 2023 16:15 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/163863 |
Citation Data
Cited 5 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
Edit Item |