Turner, Jeffrey, Williams, Geraint ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Abstract
Aims: To assess the interobserver agreement in the reporting of colorectal polyps among histopathologists participating in the Welsh Bowel Cancer Screening (BCS) programme. Methods and results: Twelve benign polyps representative of BCS cases were identified from pathology files and reported by 28 BCS histopathologists using proforma sheets. The level of agreement between the participants and a gold standard was determined using kappa (κ) statistics. A moderate level of agreement was achieved in the reporting of polyp type [κ = 0.45; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.34-0.59] and adenomatous lesions were distinguished from non-adenomatous lesions in 96% of cases. Substantial agreement was obtained in distinguishing low- and high-grade dysplasias (κ = 0.67; 95% CI 0.50-0.86), but there was only fair agreement in reporting excision margin status (κ = 0.24; 95% CI 0.07-0.43) with frequent use of the 'uncertain' category. Significant issues included categorizing serrated lesions, recognizing focal high-grade dysplasia and epithelial misplacement, and apparent overdiagnosis of villous change in adenomas. Conclusions: Interobserver variability in some aspects of reporting colorectal polyps by BCS pathologists is suboptimal, with a potential impact upon patient management and the efficient running of the screening service.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Medicine |
Subjects: | R Medicine > RB Pathology R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0254 Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology (including Cancer) |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Adenocarcinoma; Adenoma; Adenomatous Polyps; Colonic Polyps; Colorectal Neoplasms; Early Detection of Cancer; Humans; Hyperplasia; Intestinal Polyps; Observer Variation; Pathology, Clinical; Wales |
Publisher: | Wiley-Blackwell |
ISSN: | 0309-0167 |
Date of Acceptance: | 6 February 2013 |
Last Modified: | 31 Oct 2022 09:11 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/80108 |
Citation Data
Cited 34 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |