Morey, Richard D. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9220-3179, Chambers, Christopher D. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6058-4114, Etchells, Peter J., Harris, Christine R., Hoekstra, Rink, Lakens, Daniël, Lewandowsky, Stephan, Morey, Candice Coker ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7644-5239, Newman, Daniel P., Schönbrodt, Felix D., Vanpaemel, Wolf, Wagenmakers, Eric-Jan and Zwaan, Rolf A. 2016. The Peer Reviewers' Openness Initiative: incentivizing open research practices through peer review. Royal Society Open Science 3 (1) , 150547. 10.1098/rsos.150547 |
Preview |
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (336kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Openness is one of the central values of science. Open scientific practices such as sharing data, materials and analysis scripts alongside published articles have many benefits, including easier replication and extension studies, increased availability of data for theory-building and meta-analysis, and increased possibility of review and collaboration even after a paper has been published. Although modern information technology makes sharing easier than ever before, uptake of open practices had been slow. We suggest this might be in part due to a social dilemma arising from misaligned incentives and propose a specific, concrete mechanism—reviewers withholding comprehensive review—to achieve the goal of creating the expectation of open practices as a matter of scientific principle.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Psychology |
Subjects: | A General Works > AZ History of Scholarship The Humanities |
Publisher: | The Royal Society |
ISSN: | 2054-5703 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 30 March 2016 |
Date of Acceptance: | 1 December 2015 |
Last Modified: | 05 May 2023 12:36 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/85057 |
Citation Data
Cited 121 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
Edit Item |