Latif, Eshrar ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3982-6929, Lawrence, Mike, Shea, Andy and Walker, Pete 2016. In situ assessment of the fabric and energy performance of five conventional and non-conventional wall systems using comparative coheating tests. Building and Environment 109 , pp. 68-81. 10.1016/j.buildenv.2016.09.017 |
Preview |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
Comparative coheating tests have been carried out in five test buildings with walls constructed of Concrete Block Masonry and timber framed Hemp-lime composite, Polyisocyanurate (PIR), Wood Fibre and Mineral Wool. Five different methods of determining heat loss coefficient (HLC) were applied during the data analysis. While some variability in HLC values was observed between the different forms of construction, the hierarchy of HLC values among the test buildings were consistent, with the Concrete Block Masonry exhibiting the highest and Wood Fibre test building exhibiting the lowest HLC values. Except for the Concrete Block Masonry, there was good agreement between the calculated HLC values and those derived by applying the method 5 where the analysis incorporated both the effects of solar radiation and thermal mass. The in-situ U-value for the Concrete Block wall, determined by the average method, was 32.8% higher than its design value, whilst the other wall systems showed marginally lower U-values than their corresponding design U-values.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Architecture |
Subjects: | N Fine Arts > NA Architecture T Technology > TD Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Coheating test; U-value; In-situ test; Bio-based insulation materials; Hemp-lime; Wood fibre insulation; Thermal conductivity |
Publisher: | Elsevier |
ISSN: | 0360-1323 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 17 November 2016 |
Date of Acceptance: | 13 September 2016 |
Last Modified: | 15 Nov 2024 14:00 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/94640 |
Citation Data
Cited 12 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
Edit Item |