Newburn, Tim, Jones, Trevor ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3976-2024 and Blaustein, Jarrett 2018. Policy mobilities and comparative penality. Theoretical Criminology 22 (4) , pp. 563-581. 10.1177/1362480617713985 |
Preview |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (378kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The study of ‘policy transfer’ has been subject to sustained criticism, in particular by critical policy studies scholars. This critique - together with the rather marginal role that policy transfer research has played in criminological debates to date - raises questions about the continued utility of such research in scholarly discussions of crime control and penal policy-making. However, we argue here that such studies can enhance our understanding of the local, national and global influences over crime control policy formation. In particular, the developing interest in comparative criminology, in the political economy of punishment, and in the ‘proximate causes’ of penal change, are all areas to which this work can make a useful contribution. Although we feel that some elements of the critique are over-stated, the critical policy studies notions of ‘mobilities’ and ‘assemblages’ offer important advances that capture more fully the complexities of the processes involved in the cross-national movement of penal policy.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Social Sciences (Includes Criminology and Education) |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > H Social Sciences (General) |
Uncontrolled Keywords: | Policy transfer; policy mobilities; punishment; political economy; penality; comparative penal policy |
Publisher: | SAGE |
ISSN: | 1362-4806 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 11 May 2017 |
Date of Acceptance: | 21 April 2017 |
Last Modified: | 03 Dec 2024 04:15 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/100510 |
Citation Data
Cited 34 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
Edit Item |