Zapata-Lancaster, Maria Gabriela ![]() |
Preview |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (137kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Design practitioners face an increased pressure to design low energy buildings because of the need to reduce the carbon emissions of the built environment. As a response, building performance simulation tools (BPS) have been created for designers to facilitate the decision-making and help them to propose low energy buildings. This paper is based on a research that adopted ethnographic research to conduct a case study comparison and explore how BPS tools were deployed by designers during real-time design process. The research adopted a constructivist approach informed by philosophy of technology and human computer interaction theories to reveal what designers were doing during the design process as opposed to what they should be doing according to best practice advice. This paper focuses on the application of ethnographic methods and brings attention to the advantages, challenges and limitations of adopting ethnographic research to investigate the `context of use of tools'. The discussion of the method brings attention to the context of use of tools as the departure point to develop a range of solutions for design support.
Item Type: | Conference or Workshop Item (Paper) |
---|---|
Date Type: | Published Online |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Architecture |
Subjects: | N Fine Arts > NA Architecture T Technology > TD Environmental technology. Sanitary engineering |
Publisher: | eCAADe Education and Research in Computer Aided Architectural Design in Europe, Brussels and the Welsh School of Architecture, Cardiff University, Wales, United Kingdom |
ISBN: | 9781899895267 |
Related URLs: | |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 9 June 2017 |
Last Modified: | 02 Nov 2022 11:09 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/101039 |
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |