Gruffydd Jones, Branwen ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9204-1621
2016.
Definitions and categories: epistemologies of race and critique.
Postcolonial Studies
19
(2)
, pp. 173-184.
10.1080/13688790.2016.1254014
Item availability restricted. |
PDF
- Published Version
Restricted to Repository staff only Download (399kB) |
Abstract
One of the striking and important features of The Eurocentric Conception of World Politics is the breadth and depth of literature over two and a half centuries which is examined. Hobson reveals irrefutably the centrality of racialised thought to the foundations of the disciplinary field of International Relations. Such an exercise necessarily encounters difficult methodological questions. This contribution to the forum reflects on the methodological and epistemological challenges of the critique of racial thought. How should we define racialised or racist thought, and how should we distinguish the various strands of racial and eurocentric thought? Does it matter if a critique of racial thought employs modes of categorisation and typology which seem to mirror the epistemological or methodological features of some strands of racial thought itself?
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Law |
Subjects: | J Political Science > JZ International relations |
Additional Information: | @ Branwen Gruffydd Jones |
Publisher: | Taylor and Francis |
ISSN: | 1466-1888 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 9 July 2017 |
Last Modified: | 06 May 2023 05:49 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/102203 |
Citation Data
Cited 7 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
Edit Item |