Passive-ocean radial basis function approach to improve temporal gravity recovery from GRACE observations

Yang, Fan, Kusche, Jürgen, Forootan, Ehsan ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3055-041X and Rietbroek, Roelof 2017. Passive-ocean radial basis function approach to improve temporal gravity recovery from GRACE observations. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth 122 (8) , pp. 6875-6892. 10.1002/2016JB013633

Preview

PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version Download (2MB) | Preview

Abstract

We present a state-of-the-art approach of passive-ocean Modified Radial Basis Functions (MRBFs) that improves the recovery of time-variable gravity fields from GRACE. As is well known, spherical harmonics (SHs), which are commonly used to recover gravity fields, are orthogonal basis functions with global coverage. However, the chosen SH truncation involves a global compromise between data coverage and obtainable resolution, and strong localized signals may not be fully captured. Radial basis functions (RBFs) provide another representation, which has been proposed in earlier works to be better suited to retrieve regional gravity signals. In this paper, we propose a MRBF approach by embedding the known coastal geometries in the RBF parameterization and imposing global mass conservation and equilibrium behavior of the oceans. Our hypothesis is that, with this physically justified constraint, the GRACE-derived gravity signals can be more realistically partitioned into the land and ocean contributions along the coastlines. We test this new technique to invert monthly gravity fields from GRACE level-1b observations covering 2005-2010, for which the numerical results indicate that: (1) MRBF-based solutions reduce the number of parameters by approximately 10%, and allow for more flexible regularization when compared to ordinary RBF solutions; and (2) the MRBF-derived mass flux is better confined along coastal areas. The latter is particularly tested in the Southern Greenland, and our results indicate that the trend of mass loss from the MRBF solutions is approximately 11% larger than that from the SH solutions, and approximately 4% ∼ 6% larger than that of RBF solutions.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Earth and Environmental Sciences
Publisher:	Wiley-Blackwell
ISSN:	2169-9313
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	31 July 2017
Date of Acceptance:	23 July 2017
Last Modified:	28 Nov 2024 11:30
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/103115

Citation Data

Cited 13 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item