Carney, Damian  ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7892-054X
2017.
Up to standard? A critique of IPSO's Editors' Code of Practice and IMPRESS' Standards Code (Part 1).
Tottels Communications Law
22
(3)
, pp. 77-88.
|
Preview |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (499kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This, the first part of a two-part article, compares and contrasts the Independent Press Standards Organisation (IPSO) Editors' Code and the Independent Monitor of the Press (IMPRESS) Standards Code to identify their strengths and weaknesses, and whether they are 'fit for purpose'.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Date Type: | Publication |
| Status: | Published |
| Schools: | Schools > Journalism, Media and Culture |
| Publisher: | Tottel Publishing |
| ISSN: | 1746-7616 |
| Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 24 October 2017 |
| Date of Acceptance: | 11 September 2017 |
| Last Modified: | 30 Nov 2024 14:30 |
| URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/105913 |
Actions (repository staff only)
 |
Edit Item |
Download Statistics
Download Statistics