Simion, Mona ![]() |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/logos-episteme20167336
Abstract
According to Jonathan Kvanvig, the practice of taking back one’s assertion when finding out that one has been mistaken or gettiered fails to speak in favour of a knowledge norm of assertion. To support this claim, he introduces a distinction between taking back the content of the assertion, and taking back the speech act itself. This paper argues that Kvanvig’s distinction does not successfully face close speech-act-theoretic scrutiny. Furthermore, I offer an alternative diagnosis of the target cases sourced in the normativity of action.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | English, Communication and Philosophy |
Publisher: | Institutul European |
ISSN: | 2069-0533 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 26 October 2017 |
Date of Acceptance: | 1 April 2015 |
Last Modified: | 03 Nov 2022 09:47 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/105978 |
Citation Data
Cited 4 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |