Simion, Mona ![]() ![]() |
Preview |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (512kB) | Preview |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-018-1722-y
Abstract
One popular view in recent years takes the source of testimonial entitlement to reside in the intrinsically social character of testimonial exchanges. This paper looks at two extant incarnations of this view, what we dub ‘weak’ and ‘modest’ social anti-reductionism, and questions the rationales behind their central claims. Furthermore, we put forth an alternative, strong social anti-reductionist account, and show how it does better than the competition on both theoretical and empirical grounds.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | English, Communication and Philosophy |
Publisher: | Springer Verlag |
ISSN: | 0039-7857 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 26 February 2018 |
Date of Acceptance: | 7 February 2018 |
Last Modified: | 04 Dec 2024 01:15 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/109443 |
Citation Data
Cited 11 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |