An evaluation of canonical forms for non-rigid 3D shape retrieval

Pickup, David, Liu, Juncheng, Sun, Xianfang ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6114-0766, Rosin, Paul L. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4965-3884, Martin, Ralph R., Cheng, Zhiquan, Lian, Zhouhui, Nie, Sipin, Jin, Longcun, Shamai, Gil, Sahillioğlu, Yusuf and Kavan, Ladislav 2018. An evaluation of canonical forms for non-rigid 3D shape retrieval. Graphical Models 97 , pp. 17-29. 10.1016/j.gmod.2018.02.002

Preview

PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version Download (18MB) | Preview

Abstract

Canonical forms attempt to factor out a non-rigid shape’s pose, giving a pose-neutral shape. This opens up the possibility of using methods originally designed for rigid shape retrieval for the task of non-rigid shape retrieval. We extend our recent benchmark for testing canonical form algorithms. Our new benchmark is used to evaluate a greater number of state-of-the-art canonical forms, on five recent non-rigid retrieval datasets, within two different retrieval frameworks. A total of fifteen different canonical form methods are compared. We find that the difference in retrieval accuracy between different canonical form methods is small, but varies significantly across different datasets. We also find that efficiency is the main difference between the methods.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Computer Science & Informatics
Publisher:	Elsevier
ISSN:	1524-0703
Funders:	EPSRC
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	8 March 2018
Date of Acceptance:	15 February 2018
Last Modified:	29 Nov 2024 20:45
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/109728

Available Versions of this Item

• An evaluation of canonical forms for non-rigid 3D shape retrieval. (deposited 08 Mar 2018 09:39) [Currently Displayed]
  • An evaluation of canonical forms for non-rigid 3D shape retrieval. (deposited 19 Mar 2018 14:08)

Citation Data

Cited 5 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item