Drew, Joseph, Razin, Eran and Andrews, Rhys ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1904-9819 2019. Rhetoric in municipal amalgamations: A comparative analysis. Local Government Studies 45 (5) , pp. 748-767. 10.1080/03003930.2018.1530657 |
Preview |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (347kB) | Preview |
Abstract
There is a large literature that seeks to evaluate municipal amalgamations ex post, but a relative dearth of scholarly inquiry into the practical political task of persuading the public to accept amalgamations ex ante. We address this important gap in the literature by conducting a rhetorical analysis to ascertain what types of arguments are believed to be efficacious for persuasion on amalgamation. We find evidence to suggest belief in the efficacy of persuading the public through recourse to various projected dreadful consequences, particularly amongst opponents of amalgamation. We conclude by considering some of the reasons behind the observed rhetorics and briefly outline one possible solution.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Business (Including Economics) |
Publisher: | Taylor & Francis |
ISSN: | 0300-3930 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 26 September 2018 |
Date of Acceptance: | 25 September 2018 |
Last Modified: | 17 Nov 2024 07:00 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/115250 |
Citation Data
Cited 21 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
Edit Item |