Acceptability, internal consistency and test-retest reliability of scales to assess parental and nursery staff's self-efficacy, motivation and knowledge in relation to pre-school children's nutrition, oral health and physical activity

Dias, Kaiseree, White, James ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8371-8453, Metcalfe, Chris, Kipping, Ruth, Papadaki, Angeliki and Jago, Russell 2019. Acceptability, internal consistency and test-retest reliability of scales to assess parental and nursery staff's self-efficacy, motivation and knowledge in relation to pre-school children's nutrition, oral health and physical activity. Public Health Nutrition 22 (6) , pp. 967-975. 10.1017/S1368980018004111

Preview

PDF - Published Version Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (549kB) | Preview

Abstract

Objective To determine the acceptability, internal consistency and test–retest reliability of self-efficacy, motivation and knowledge scales relating to pre-school children’s nutrition, oral health and physical activity. Design An online questionnaire was completed twice with an interval of 7–11d. Setting Online questionnaires were sent to participants via email from nursery managers. The parent questionnaire was also available on the parenting website www.netmums.com. Participants Eighty-two parents and sixty-nine nursery staff from Bristol, UK who had and worked with 2–4-year-olds, respectively. Results Response rates were 86·3 and 86·0 % and missing data 15·9 and 14·5 % for the second administration of the parent and nursery staff questionnaires, respectively. Weighted κ coefficients for individual items mostly fell under the ‘moderate’ agreement category for the parental (75·0 %) and nursery staff (55·8 %) items. All self-efficacy and motivation scales had acceptable levels of internal consistency (Cronbach’s α coefficients>0·7). The intraclass correlation coefficients for the self-efficacy, motivation and knowledge scales ranged between 0·48 and 0·82. Paired t tests found an increase between test and retest knowledge scores for the Nutrition Motivation (t=−2·91, df=81, P=0·00) and Knowledge (t=−3·22, df=81, P=0·00) scales in the parent questionnaire. Conclusions Our findings demonstrate that the items and scales show good acceptability, internal consistency and test–retest reliability.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Medicine Centre for Trials Research (CNTRR)
Publisher:	Cambridge University Press (CUP)
ISSN:	1368-9800
Funders:	NIHR
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	19 February 2019
Date of Acceptance:	21 December 2018
Last Modified:	02 May 2023 18:04
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/119692

Citation Data

Cited 8 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item