Access-denied: Research on sex in prison and the subjugation of ‘deviant knowledge’

Stevens, Alisa ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5422-7065 2020. Access-denied: Research on sex in prison and the subjugation of ‘deviant knowledge’. Criminology and Criminal Justice 20 (4) , pp. 451-470. 10.1177/1748895819839740

Preview

PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version Download (341kB) | Preview

Abstract

Despite the fundamental necessity of gaining gatekeeper approval for prisons fieldwork, researchers rarely publicly acknowledge and analyse their failures to secure access. Drawing upon the Foucauldian-inspired literatures on the production and policing of new criminological knowledge, this article presents as a case study the Sex in Prison research project, instigated by the Howard League for Penal Reform, and for which permission to interview serving prisoners was refused. This denial of access, it is argued, resulted from a politically motivated attempt to prevent the acquisition of knowledge perceived as likely to be unfavourable to and critical of prison authorities, emanating from ‘deviant’ informants, using ‘deviant’ methods and obtained on behalf of ‘deviant’ penal reformers. The troubling implications for prisons researchers are explored. The article concludes by highlighting the potential of formerly imprisoned people, as participants in research, to circumvent the limits to knowledge imposed by prison authorities.

Item Type:	Article
Date Type:	Publication
Status:	Published
Schools:	Social Sciences (Includes Criminology and Education)
Publisher:	SAGE
ISSN:	1748-8958
Date of First Compliant Deposit:	8 March 2019
Date of Acceptance:	28 February 2019
Last Modified:	05 Dec 2024 14:00
URI:	https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/120373

Citation Data

Cited 3 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item