Clarke, David ![]() ![]() |
Preview |
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives. Download (298kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article compares two documentary films that address an apparent crisis of post-witnessing at memorials that commemorate the victims of National Socialism. In the context of contemporary debates about appropriate behaviour for tourists at sites of “dark” or “difficult” heritage, Sergei Loznitsa’s Austerlitz (2016) and Rex Bloomstein’s KZ (2006) take very different approaches to observing the act of visiting concentration camp memorials. Whereas Loznitsa adopts an observational documentary mode, constructing a cultural hierarchy between the touristic observer and the cinematic observer at memorials in Germany, Bloomstein’s film uses a participatory mode to prompt the viewer to consider the complexities of the affective-discursive practice of tourists engaging with the suffering of victims at the Mauthausen memorial in Austria. The article argues that Bloomstein’s decision to adopt a participatory approach is more productive in allowing us to think about the significance of responses to victims’ suffering at such sites.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Modern Languages |
Subjects: | D History General and Old World > DD Germany |
Publisher: | Oñati International Institute for the Sociology of Law |
ISSN: | 2079-5971 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 15 March 2019 |
Date of Acceptance: | 26 February 2019 |
Last Modified: | 05 May 2023 00:10 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/120796 |
Citation Data
Cited 1 time in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |