Cardiff University | Prifysgol Caerdydd ORCA
Online Research @ Cardiff 
WelshClear Cookie - decide language by browser settings

Silk versus venom: alternative capture strategies employed by closely related myrmecophagous spiders

Michálek, Ondrej, Rezác, Milan, Líznarová, Eva, Symondson, William O. C. ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3343-4679 and Pekár, Stano 2019. Silk versus venom: alternative capture strategies employed by closely related myrmecophagous spiders. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 126 (3) , pp. 545-554. 10.1093/biolinnean/bly181

[thumbnail of silk_versus_venom_manuscript.pdf]
Preview
PDF - Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (757kB) | Preview

Abstract

Predators that prey on dangerous species have evolved effective capture traits. In spiders, venom and silk represent distinct substances associated with prey capture. However, the use of such adaptations comes at a cost. Based on a possible trade-off, the use of only one effective capture mechanism should be optimized if a predator is to specialize on a single type of dangerous prey. We investigated hunting strategies in two Callilepis spp. and one Nomisia species, Nomisia exornata, closely related ant-eating spiders from the family Gnaphosidae. We hypothesized that specialized Callilepis spiders would adopt a more stereotyped capture strategy compared with less specialized Nomisia. We also expected that Callilepis would rely on only one subjugation mechanism. To test this, we compared their hunting efficacy and hunting strategies, with an emphasis on venom vs. silk utilization. Nomisia restrained ants with silk (then bit them), whereas Callilepis relied solely on its venom. This was also reflected in trophic traits connected with silk and venom utilization; Callilepis had larger venom glands than Nomisia, whereas Nomisia had more piriform silk glands than Callilepis. Callilepis was more effective because it subdued prey more quickly, presumably owing to ant-specific venom. Callilepis and Nomisia handled ants from two subfamilies with different degrees of success; Callilepis was more successful with Formicinae ants, whereas Nomisia handled Myrmicinae ants better. We show that sole reliance on venom allows Callilepis to be more efficient in overcoming ants than Nomisia, which uses both silk and venom. However, such specific adaptations might restrict specialized predators from exploiting alternative prey.

Item Type: Article
Date Type: Publication
Status: Published
Schools: Biosciences
Publisher: Oxford University Press (OUP)
ISSN: 0024-4066
Date of First Compliant Deposit: 27 March 2019
Date of Acceptance: 18 October 2018
Last Modified: 07 Nov 2023 06:54
URI: https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/121231

Citation Data

Cited 7 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data

Actions (repository staff only)

Edit Item Edit Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics