Chaney, Paul ![]() ![]() |
Preview |
PDF
- Published Version
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution. Download (2MB) | Preview |
Abstract
In order to provide a timely assessment of India’s fulfilment of international obligations on religious freedom this article explores the nature and ‘issue-salience’ of different human rights ‘pathologies’. It uses critical frame analysis of the corpus of civil society organisations’ (CSOs) submissions to the third cycle Universal Periodic Review (UPR). The findings reveal CSOs’ concerns over the weakening of rule of law institutions and restrictions on civil society during the period under study. This has impacted upon the ability of individual actors to protect religious freedom. The civil society discourse also highlights a broad range of failings; including communal violence, police malpractice/ judicial shortcomings, discrimination, oppression and incitement. In contrast, the Government’s UPR submission fails to acknowledge these issues. In conceptual terms, this disconnect suggests performativity and legitimation are a feature of the post-2014 NDA administration’s framing of human rights. It appears to embrace civil society engagement and the promotion of religious freedom in a way that advances political legitimacy, whereas civil society accounts suggest otherwise and point to ‘legitimation’ - or a disjuncture between rhetoric and reality.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Social Sciences (Includes Criminology and Education) Wales Institute of Social & Economic Research, Data & Methods (WISERD) |
Subjects: | H Social Sciences > HM Sociology J Political Science > JA Political science (General) |
Publisher: | Taylor & Francis |
ISSN: | 1364-2987 |
Funders: | ESRC |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 10 September 2019 |
Date of Acceptance: | 12 August 2019 |
Last Modified: | 02 May 2023 21:43 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/124931 |
Citation Data
Cited 6 times in Scopus. View in Scopus. Powered By Scopus® Data
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |