Pontin, Ben ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
PDF
- Accepted Post-Print Version
Download (391kB) |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2018.3
Abstract
The paper critically examines the consensus among tort scholars that an injured view can never be actionable in nuisance. The consensus, it is argued, is based on a problematic understanding of the permanence of early modern nuisance authority, and a neglect of modernisation in the definition of actionable injury in the nineteenth century, in response to industrialisation, urbanisation and, crucially, suburbanisation. David Sugarman's ‘textbook tradition’ provides a valuable disciplinary explanation for the mismatch between scholarly portrayals of doctrine and authoritative judicial formulations in decided cases.
Item Type: | Article |
---|---|
Date Type: | Publication |
Status: | Published |
Schools: | Cardiff Law & Politics Law |
Publisher: | Cambridge University Press |
ISSN: | 0261-3875 |
Date of First Compliant Deposit: | 9 September 2019 |
Date of Acceptance: | 21 July 2017 |
Last Modified: | 27 Nov 2024 06:00 |
URI: | https://orca.cardiff.ac.uk/id/eprint/125311 |
Actions (repository staff only)
![]() |
Edit Item |